| 1. | Introduction |
| 2. | Users |
| 2.1. | User Administration |
| 2.2. | Publish Notification |
| 2.3. | Object Deletion by Users |
| 3. | Groups and Workflows |
| 3.1. | Introduction |
| 3.2. | Submission Workflow |
| 3.2.1. | Properties of a Workflow |
| 3.2.2. | Properties of a Workflow Stage |
| 3.2.3. | Workflow Actions |
| 3.2.4. | Process Completion Criteria |
| 3.2.5. | Example Workflow Definitions |
| 3.2.5.1. | Example 1: Basic intraLibrary workflow |
| 3.2.5.2. | Example 2: Contribute, Catalogue, Review |
| 3.2.5.3. | Example 3: Advanced Cataloguing Workflow |
| 3.2.5.4. | Example 4: Simple content managing workflow |
| 3.2.6. | Working on learning objects |
| 3.2.7. | Defining a workflow for use in intraLibrary |
| 3.2.8. | Removing users and group in intraLibrary |
| 3.3. | Working in Groups and Workflows |
| 3.3.1. | Relationship Between Groups and Workflows |
| 3.3.2. | Access to Objects in a Workflow |
| 3.3.3. | Work Area |
| 4. | Collections |
| 4.1. | Introduction |
| 4.2. | Properties of Collections |
| 4.2.1. | Summary of Properties |
| 4.2.2. | Relationship to Classification Systems |
| 4.2.3. | Relationship to Application Profiles and License Models |
| 4.3. | Managing Collections |
| 4.4. | Managing Access |
| 4.4.1. | Relationship to Groups |
| 4.4.2. | Access Permissions |
| 4.4.3. | Contributing to a Collection |
| 4.5. | An Example of Using Collections |
| 4.6. | Precedence Issues |
| 5. | Metadata and Vocabularies |
| 5.1. | Introduction |
| 5.2. | Configure Application Profiles |
| 5.3. | Edit an Application Profile |
| 5.4. | Manage Vocabularies |
| 6. | Search |
| 6.1. | Configure Search |
| 6.1.1. | Simple Search |
| 6.1.2. | Advanced Search |
| 6.1.3. | Reference Search |
| 6.2. | Public Search Filters |
| 7. | Agreements |
| 8. | Licences |
| 8.1. | Introduction |
| 8.2. | Licensing Model |
| 8.3. | Depositing Learning Objects |
| 8.4. | Accessing Learning Objects |
| 8.5. | Configuring the System |
| 8.6. | What community licensing doesn't do |
| 8.7. | Technical Solution |
| 8.8. | References on Licencing |
| 9. | System |
| 9.1. | Rebuild Learning Object Cache |
| 9.2. | Re-index Metadata |
| 9.3. | Rebuild Thumnails |
| 9.4. | Reload Templates |
| 9.5. | View Log |
| 9.6. | Additional Settings |
| 10. | Metadata Templates |
| 10.1. | Introducing Metadata Templates |
| 10.2. | Creating Metadata Templates |
| 10.3. | Template Format |
| 11. | Email Templates |
| 11.1. | Email Alerts for Stage Change |
| 11.2. | Email Alerts for Publication of an Object |
| 11.3. | Email Alerts for Annotation of an Object |
| 11.4. | Configuring the email templates |
| 11.5. | Email Template Macros |
| 12. | Appendix 1: Templates Properties |
This document is for intraLibrary administrators carrying out routine administration tasks. For first-time configration tasks see the Configuration Guide.
One or more users may have an administration role in an installation of intraLibrary. When they log-in to intraLibrary these users see an extra Admin Tools section in the toolbar.
When the Admin Tools option is selected an additional toolbar becomes available.
This document describes the facilities that are available in the Admin Tools section of intraLibrary, and the issues that must be considered before changing some of the settings. The section headings follow the items on the Admin Tools toolbar.
The "users" section provides facilities to add, delete and update users.
Users can be created in the following roles:
The licence for the intraLibrary installation constrains the number of users that can be added in the contributor, librarian and administrator roles.
In the "system" area the administrator can add and remove email addresses to the publish notification list. When an object is published into the repository, every email address added to this list will receive an email notification giving information about the object.
In the "system" area the administrator can choose a number of general configuration options that will affect users. These include whether to allow users the ability to delete and unpublish objects that they have contributed to the library. If this option is not selected then only librarians can delete and unpublish objects. If this option is set to yes, users in the contributor role will see the unpublish and delete buttons beside published objects that they have contributed to the repository.
It is hard to separate the functions of groups from workflows as the two are tightly linked, so they will both be treated together. First the concepts of the submission workflow are described then how to configure a workflow including setting up particular groups of users with particular roles. It should be stressed that intraLibrary has a default workflow which many people will find satisfies their needs and if that is the case there is no need to read this section.
Several new terms will be introduced in this section so it is useful to start with some definitions:
A submission workflow defines the steps that an object passes through as it is uploaded, catalogued and published into the repository. IntraLibrary has a highly configurable workflow. It enables complex, multi-role workflows to be defined, whilst still supporting the simplicity of a single-stage workflow where appropriate.
The progress of a learning object through its submission to the repository is defined by the stages of the submission workflow. When a learning object progresses through a workflow, stage transitions can trigger certain events, such as a change in the object's published state and sending alerts to users with relevant workflow roles. When learning objects are moved in a workflow, they are moved to a particular stage, such as being sent back to a previous stage for clarification, or progressing to the next stage for classification.
Each stage of a submission workflow can have one or more workflow processes assigned to it. This means parallel processes can be defined, so users in different roles can potentially access the learning object at the same stage, and do different things to it. The things that can be done to a learning object are know as workflow actions. The list of available actions is given below.
Group members can be assigned one or more roles in a submission workflow. A role can be associated with one or more processes in the submission workflow. This flexible arrangement means it is possible to create a variety of different ways for people to collaborate in a submission process. It anticipates the need for users in the system to contribute to the submission of learning objects in more than one way, and the need for special users who have access to most or all of the workflow.
To summarise the properties of a submission workflow:
As described above, it is a property of every workflow stage, that all users who have access to that stage will receive email alerts when objects arrive in that stage. A workflow stage can have the following additional properties.
| Property | Description | Additional Parameters |
| Change publish state | The publish state of the object will change when the object has passed through the stage. By default, objects are not published when they enter the first stage of a workflow, even if they were published before they entered the workflow. Setting this property at any stage, including the first stage, causes the object to be published so it can be seen by other users. Each further uses of this property toggles the published state of the object. | |
| Alert object owner | Object owner will be alerted when stage is completed. This is to allow the contributor of an object to be alerted when something happens to their object, for example when it is withdrawn from the repository. | |
| Alert message configurable by modifying the email template "stageChangeObjectOwnerEmail.txt" | ||
| Email addresses to alert | Emails will be sent to the supplied addresses when an object has passed through the stage. This feature is designed for sending alerts to external entities, such as mailing lists. | Email addresses |
| Alert message configurable by modifying the email template "stageChangeExternalUserEmail.txt" | ||
There is a set of predefined actions that are available to be included in any workflow process. Some actions may have completion criteria such as conformance to a subset of an application profile, or matching one of a set of licence patterns.
| Action | Description | Additional Parameters |
| Delete | Remove an object completely from the system. | |
| Edit metadata | Metadata/classification editor configured by the chosen Application Profile, and an optional metadata subset. | Metadata Subset |
| Edit rights | Licence (rights management) editor. | |
| Export | Package export functions. | |
| Preview | Package/file preview. | |
| Upload | Upload or add a new object to the system. | |
| View Metadata | Metadata preview. | |
| Overwrite | Upload a new version of an object to the system. | |
| Move object | Send the object to another stage of the workflow, with comments attached. Typically used at review stages. | Stage ID |
| Save to filesystem | Write a content package to a folder on the server filesystem. | Path of folder on server filesystem. |
| Save manifest to filesystem | Write a package manifeset to a folder on the server filesystem. Folder location is a property of the workflow process. | Path of folder on server filesystem. |
| Import from filesystem | Import a file or content package from the group's folder on the server filesystem. | |
| Return | Puts the object back into the workflow and published state it had before it entered the current workflow. | |
| Transfer object | Move the object into a different workflow stage or different group. User can move the object to any group/stage they have access to. | |
| Change collections | Modify which collections the object is a member of. User can put the object in any collections they have contribute access to. |
As mentioned above, some workflow actions may have criteria that need to be met before the process can be completed. In the user interface, the process completion button will be greyed out if these criteria have not been met. The user can still click on the button, but instead of marking the process as complete, it will display details of the completion criteria that have not been satisfied.
Process completion criteria are associated with specific actions. There are currently four actions which have process completion criteria:
The process completion criteria for the "Edit Metadata" action are driven by the application profile. This can be the whole application profile, or a part of the application profile defined in a metadata subset. If the "Edit Metadata" action is included in a workflow process, the metadata record must meet the conditions of the application profile, before the workflow process can be completed.
The conditions that can be imposed by an application profile include:
The process completion criteria for the "Edit License" action are driven by the licence model. If the "Edit License" action is included in a workflow process, the license information must match one the license patterns in the license model before the workflow process can be completed.
The conditions that can be imposed by a licence pattern include:
The "Save Package to Filesystem" and "Save Manifest to Filesystem" actions both have only one process-completion criterion. The user must have performed the action before the process can be completed. In technical terms, these two actions have a "state", i.e. the system remembers whether or not the user has performed that action.
Intrallect can create workflows to customer's requirements, or you can define your own workflows and import them into intraLIbrary. The following workflows are given as examples of what is possible. Each defines one or more processes, related actions and the published state (published/unpublished) in a workflow with one or more stages.
| Stages | Stage1: Contribute |
| Processes | Process 1: Upload and Catalogue
|
| Publish State | Unpublished |
| Stages | Stage1: Contribute | Stage2: Catalogue | Stage3: Review |
| Processes | Process 1: Upload
|
Process 1: Catalogue
|
Process 1: Check
|
| Publish State | Unpublished | Unpublished | Published |
| Stages | Stage1: Contribute | Stage2: Clear Rights | Stage3: Catalogue | Stage4: Classify |
| Processes | Process 1: Upload
|
Process 1: Rights
|
Process 1: Transcription
|
Process 1: Classify
|
| Publish State | Unpublished | Published | Published | Published |
| Stages | Stage1: Create Placeholder | Stage2: Add Content | Stage3: Review Content |
| Processes | Process 1: Upload
|
Process 1: Upload
|
Process 1: Check
|
| Publish State | Unpublished | Unpublished | Published |
Users must reserve a learning object before they can work on it. Once they have reserved the learning object, it moves to their reserved area and the actions in the workflow processes become available. A button is shown for each of the actions in each process, as well as a button to indicate that the process has been completed.
In the reserved area the user can work on the object in various ways: edit metadata, manage licensing etc. When you have completed your work, and met any criteria on the metadata, you click the button to declare the process as completed.
When all the processes at that stage are marked as completed, the object will be moved on to the next stage. Users who have access to the object at the next stage will receive an email alerting them that there is a new object to work on.
A workflow definition can be added to intraLibrary by a user who has administrator access to the repository. To do this, you must have created your workflow definition in an XML document which conforms to the XML Schema for submission workflows, which is publicly available at http://www.intrallect.com/xsd/intralibrary_workflow_v0p4.xsd.
An administrator can remove a contributor from the system. If there are objects which the contributor is working on, the administrator will have the option to have the objects ownership information removed.
Administrators can also remove whole groups from the system. If the group is currently working on objects then the administrator will have the option to transfer the objects to another group.
There may be one or more workflows available in the system. After creating a group of users, an administrator can assign one of the available workflows assigned to the group. This group of users shares an instance of the workflow. Others groups can share their own instances of the same workflow.
Users get access to processes within a workflow by being assigned workflow roles within the group. To give roles access to workflow processes, the administrator must edit the roles assigned to the process in the workflow-details page. The administrator assigns users to one or more workflow roles in the context of a particular group. Users who are members of more than one group can be given different roles in each group.
To participate in a submission workflow, users must have contributor status. Normal users do not have a Work Area.
Learning Objects belong to one group only, and are therefore part of only one submission workflow. Objects exist at a single stage in the instance of the workflow belonging to that group. Group members assigned a role in a submission workflow may have access to one or more stages of the workflow.
Users share a pending area for each stage of the group's workflow. All users in the relevant roles will be alerted when an object is moved into the relevant pending area. Any user in the relevant roles can then choose to select this object to work on (see below).
To allow a contributor user to add an object into a particular collection, the administrator must give the group "contribute" permission to the collection. An object must be in at least one collection and can be in many different collections.
Each participating user (contributor user) has a work area where they participate in the submission workflow. The work area is divided into four parts, reserved, available, upload and import.
In the available section users can see all the learning objects they potentially have access to. Each learning object has a listing that includes title and description and there are buttons for access to basic functions such as preview. Users can select the objects they want to reserve to work on.
In the reserved section you see all the objects you have chosen to work on. In addition to the basic information and functions, each process that is available on the object is listed below it on a separate line.
In both the available and reserved areas, the list of objects displayed can be constrained by various criteria. Users can apply filters to select objects in a particular group and a particular stage of a workflow. Saved search filters can be used to constrain the list of objects by specific properties.
The upload section is where a user can contribute an object (file, pages, URL, etc) to the system. Users only see this section if they have access to a workflow process that includes the "upload" action. Users can choose whether or not to automatically reserve objects they contribute. Users who are members of several groups can choose which group for contributing the object. If the group has access to more than one collection then they can choose which collections to put the object into.
The import section is provided to enable users to import large files from the server filesystem. Users only see this section if they have access to a workflow process that includes the "import from filesystem" action. When users import an object, they can choose whether or not to automatically reserve that object.
There are number of properties which can be set for a collection by an administration user:
One or more classifications systems (taxonomies) can be used for each collection. This enables shared classification systems to be used for all objects in the repository, seperate classifications to be used for each collection, or both.
The classification systems used for collections affect what users see in their Browse Library interface, and contributing users see in their Classification interface. For example, if collection A has uses classification system A and collection B uses classification systems B and C then:-
Collections in intraLibrary can use different metadata application-profiles and licence models from each other. Many customers may have no need for this feature, so it is important to point out that many installations of intraLibrary will only every use one metadata application-profile and one licence model (if any). If this is the case, then only ever need to be one "active" application profile and licence model, and these will be applied to all collections by default.
However, it is anticipated that some customers will need to manage collections of objects which have different metadata properties, or are licensed under different sets of conditions. In this case the submission workflow will apply the application profile and the licence model appropriate to the collection the object is in. It should be noted that:
To manage collections, click on the "Collections" link the "Admin Tools" navigation bar. This will open the "Collections Management" area. In this area an administrator user can change the properties of existing collections, add new collections to a system, remove collections which have no objects in them.
In new installations of intraLibrary, and installations that have been migrated from previous versions of the software, there will be a single collection called "default collection". You can rename and change any other property of this collection by clicking the "Edit Properties" link for this collection.
To add a new collection, click the "Add Collection" button at the top of the Collections Management area. You will be taken to a form to fill in all the properties of the new collection.
For information about changing which collections an object is in, please see the Librarian Guide.
Managing of access to collections is defined through the collections' relationships to groups of users. Every group has a relationship with every collection. For each group-collection relationship, the permission which the group members have when working with objects in a collection are defined.
To make it easier to manage the relationship between large numbers of collections and groups of users, each collection has a default set of access permissions. Groups who have not had specific access-permissions assigned to them for a particular collection get the default access permissions. Therefore the default access permissions for a collection are generally the lowest common denominator of access an administrator wants to allow.
There are four permissions associated with each group-collection relationship, and they are described below. The administrator can choose any combination of them. For example the administrator could allow members of group A to be able to find and preview objects in collection B without allowing them to export and contribute objects. They are:-
Please note: For simple objects, such as single documents or media files, the distinction between "preview" and "export" has little meaning, since it is necessary to download the file to be able to preview it. The disctinction only has meaning for more complex objects, such as content packages, where it would more difficult, although not impossible, for a user to download every file connected with an object and reassemble it.
For a user to contribute an object to a collection they must:
A simple example of relating groups to collections is shown in the diagram below. In this case User X is in group A and User Y is in groups B and C. Group A has full access permissions (ie find, preview, export and contribute) to collection A but no access permissions to Collections B and C. Similarly group B has full access permissions to Collection B but no access permissions to Collections A and C.
As a practical example consider the process involved in creating a collection (Collection A) and giving full access to it for members of group A and no access to it for members of group B and group C. Assuming that groups A, B and C already exist, you would need to perform the following steps:-
When contributing an object to intraLibrary, there is an order of precedence which determines which application profile and license model is applied to an object. This is only an issue in installations when more than one application profile or license model is being used.
The general order of precedence is collections, groups, default settings. This means that if features are defined at the level of collection then they will be used. If they are not defined at collection level then the ones at group level will be used and if they are not defined at group level then the default settings will be used. For example:-
There are several options for configuring the use and behaviour of metadata and vocabularies within intraLibrary. The most important is the "application profile", which is used to control which metadata fields are in use in a particular context, and the rules for applying these metadata fields. It is also possible to modify the metadata vocabularies available within the system. Subsets of the available metadata fields can be created to help manage the work of cataloguers in the context of a workflow.
The administrator's choice of application profile affects which metadata fields users are exposed to users, and what rules are applied to these metadata fields. Typically, an organisation or project will have well defined rules for how metadata should be used, and these are projected using application profiles. They may well base their application profile on a published application profile, such as those given below.
Application profiles can be used to combine fields from more than one metadata model. The IEEE LOM model is included by default. If any other models have been added to the system, fields from these models will also be available for editing in the application profile editor. If you need to add additional metadata models to the system, please contact Intrallect. More information about choosing metadata models is provided in the Configuration Guide for intraLibrary.
One or more application profiles can be active, which means they can be applied to collections or by user groups. See the section on precedence issues for more information about how these two uses of application profiles are related. This enables an organisation to use different application profiles for different kinds of objects or services, whilst managing them all in a single repository system.
The application profile controls several aspects of each metadata field, including cardinality, optionality, visibility, editablity and vocabulary.
IntraLibrary comes with three pre-configured application profiles:
An administrator can also add, copy, delete and edit application profiles inline. If an application profile is to be based on one of the existing ones listed above, or another pre-defined application profile, it makes sense to use "copy" to avoid having to create your new application profile from scratch. When you click "add an application profile", the properties of fields in the new application profile are populated from the defaults that intraLibrary uses.
Intrallect can help you define an application profile that meets the specific needs of your project or service. Please contact Intrallect (support@intrallect.com) for more information.
IntraLibrary includes the ability to edit an application profile inline. To do this, click the edit link of the relevant application profile in the listing. Editing an application profile should only be undertaken by someone who knows what they want to achieve with an application profile and who is very familiar with the IEEE LOM metadata model.
One simple property of an application profile that can be changed easily is the default optionality of an application profile. This affects the list of metadata fields that appears by default in the metadata editor. The default is to show only the mandatory fields. If for example it was desired to show all contributing users all the mandatory and recommended fields by default, the default optionality should be changed to recommended.
The following properties of an individual field can be modified:
The administrator can manage the vocabularies used in the metadata by going to the "vocabularies" section of the "admin tools". It is possible to create, edit and delete vocabularies. Vocabularies can be modified in various ways including:
The system will prevent you from deleting a vocabulary that is currently being applied in an application profile. It will not stop you from modifying any vocabulary, so it is important to be aware of which vocabularies are being used in the system, and how any changes will affect users.
Changes to the vocabularies affect what terms users will see in the drop-down list for each vocabulary. These drop-down lists are used in the metadata editor, and the advanced search interface. If you edit a vocabulary term (token) itself, metadata records which include the original term will not be affected. If you change the label for a vocabulary term, this change will be visible everywhere the label is used.
This interface allows you to configure the following aspects of the search features in intraLibrary.
By default intraLibrary is configured to index all the main free-text metadata fields in the simple search. Those metadata fields with fixed vocabularies are excluded from this index because they might skew the search towards words that are used as tokens in the vocabularies.
You can use this interface to change these defaults. If you do change these settings, you must re-index the metadata (see later) before they will take effect.
The default drop-down list of metadata fields in the advanced search interface includes the metadata fields that are most generally useful. However specific implementations may value other metadata fields more highly. This interface allows you to configure which metadata fields appear in the drop-down list. You could select all the metadata fields, but this would give a long list which might be confusing to some users of your installation.
Values stored in specified metadata fields can appear as links in the view metadata page. A user can click such a link to see a list of objects which match the value. A good example of where this is useful is when one object makes a reference to another object, using the "relations" part of LOM metadata. The user can click on the link to the reference and see the object the metadata refers to.
Making a metadata field available for "reference search" means a search link will be displayed for every instance of that field that appears in the view metadata page. Reference search is applied to the following IMS/LOM fields by default:
IntraLibrary includes the ability for users to define pre-configured search-filters from the Advanced Search page. Administrators of the system have an additional power to create public filters, for use by others users. This feature has been designed to allow administrators to make commonly used search filters available to all other users of the system.
Public search filters commonly define the sort of search constraint that users might want to deploy as their default search filter. Users will see a list of public search-filters in the relevant drop-down list in their user-preferences page. They can select a default search-filter to constrain the results of all of their search and browse operations.
Contributing users can use saved or "public" search filters to filter the contents of their work area.
NB: Public search filters are not currently exposed to other users in the context of the advanced search interface itself.
The organisation running intraLibrary may wish to use the usage agreement feature of intraLibrary to record user's acceptance of a general agreement to use the system. This agreement may encompass the legal agreements that are defined for the community licences described in the next section or it may simply be a code of conduct. The text of a usage agreement can be entered into the system by the administrator. On first or every login, the user can be presented with this agreement to accept or reject. Details of the acceptance of an agreement are recorded in the database.
A common barrier to the reuse of learning objects is the issue of ownership and copyright. Conflicting copyright agreements, or uncertainty over ownership and usage permissions, is a constant thorn in the side of those who want to share learning objects within or between organisations.
Intrallect has included a community licensing solution in intraLibrary to help overcome some of these barriers. This solution enables learning objects to be deposited in intraLibrary under one or more community licences. These licences define the conditions under which the learning object is made available to other users. One example of such a set of licences is Creative Commons.
It is also common to want to have some kind of usage agreement for a repository. Some users will be depositing learning objects, others will be exporting and reusing learning objects. Organisations will often want these users to acknowledge that certain conditions apply to their use of the repository. IntraLibrary administrators can define usage agreements for the various roles in the system, which users must accept before they get access to the relevant functions.
An organisation can define its own licensing model to be used in their intraLibrary repository. The licensing model consists of a set of one or more community licences. Each licence can have a different combination of the various parameters available in the Intrallect Licensing Information Model (ILIM). These licences define the conditions under which the learning object is made available to other users.
The licences can include permission, requirement and constraint parameters such as:
There is also a transfer permission, which specifies how strictly the above conditions are applied if the learning object is passed on to other users. This allows licence conditions of the sharealike type, as used by Creative Commons, to be expressed.
A licence editor action can be included in any process of a submission workflow for an intraLibrary repository. This gives the user an opportunity to select the licence under which they make their learning object available. The completion criteria of the workflow process may define a subset of licences to which the learning object must conform.
The licence editor enables the user to make a choice between the available licence templates. Each licence is presented as a row of icons with an associated radio button. The users clicks the radio button next to their chosen licence. They are then shown other fields that may need to be populated for that instance of the licence, such as the identity of the copyright holder(s). When the user has saved all the necessary information, the licence action has been completed.
When the community licensing system is activated, the licence properties of objects are visible to users when searching and browsing. When a user sees a list of objects, the type of licence will be indicated to them using a set of symbols or phrases. The symbols or phrases represent a particular permission or constraints on the user of the learning object, which may differ between the available licences. Each symbol or phrase can be a link to a description of the relevant constraint, or the relevant part of the full text of a licence agreement.
It is possible to associate different licensing systems with different collections in intraLibrary.
For an organisation to apply their own set of licences in intraLibrary, they will need to do several things.
The community licensing solution in intraLibrary does not:
The licence information needs to be stored in the repository, and potentially be portable between repositories and other systems. IntraLibrary uses the following approaches to storage and exchange of licence info:
IntraLibrary uses a memory cache of learning objects to improve performance and reduce the load on the underlying database. The maximum number of learning objects stored in the cache is configurable. A larger number will generally improve performance if sufficient memory is available on the server. See the installation notes for more details.
Occasionally a learning object may get corrupted in the cache, for example all its metadata might appear to have been lost. If this happens, the cache can be rebuilt from the learning-object data stored in the database by clicking the Rebuild learning object cache link.
If a search in intraLibrary seems to be producing strange results, or missing objects you think it should be finding, the first course of action should be to re-index the metadata. It's also important to do this if the fields that form part of a simple search are modified in the search configuration.
Re-indexing rebuilds the index the search engine uses to find objects that are relevant to a given query. Depending on the number of objects in the system, re-indexing could take a few seconds, a few minutes, or much longer. Re-indexing updates one metadata record at a time, so there is no major problem in re-indexing whilst users might be searching for objects.
If your installation is configured to support thumbnailing of image objects, you will see a link to "Rebuild object thumbnails". Thumbnails will be created for all single (JPEG) images when they are uploaded into the repository. See the installation guide for more information and configuring the repository to support thumbnailing.
Occasionally it may be necessary to rebuild thumbnails for all the image objects. You might need to do this for the following reasons:
If you need to rebuild thumbnails for any reason, click the "Rebuild object thumbnails" link. Rebuilding the thumbnails for a large number of image objects can take a while. Whilst thumbnails are being rebuilt, the "Rebuild object thumbnails" link will be greyed out every time you visit the "system" page.
A message below the "Rebuild object thumbnails" link tells you what the current thumbnails settings are. For example it might say:
If you have made changes or additions to the metadata templates ( see later), you will need to use the Reload templates link to reload the templates before the changes will be recognised.
This allows to you to view the intraLibrary log file over the web. Warning: this can become a very large file unless it is regularly rotated.
There are number of addditional settings which can be controlled from the system page:-
To save the user having to repetitively enter easily definable metadata values, IntraLibrary can optionally pre-populate new metadata records with pre-defined values. These pre-defined, or default, values are defined in stored templates which must themselves be valid IMS Metadata records in XML format. In these metadata templates any metadata field can be assigned a default value or even multiple default values where appropriate.
Metadata templates are defined using XML files which follow the IMS Metadata XML Schema. These files must be placed in the config directory of your intraLibrary installation, inside a folder called metadataTemplates. An easy way to create a metadata template is to create a dummy learning object in intraLibrary with the metadata properties you want. You can then export an IMS Metadata record from this object, and use the resulting XML file as the basis for your new metadata template. The filename of the metadata template must be of the form templatename.xml.
When you have added templates, you need to click Reload Templates in the system section of the intraLibrary admin tools to update the templates used inside intraLibrary. Templates will appear in the relevant drop-down list in the user-preferences page. The name of each template will be the name of the file with the .xml suffix removed. There is a template called default that is supplied with the system. You can overwrite this by creating your own default.xml template in the metadataTemplates folder.
Metadata templates are defined in XML files which follow the IMS Metadata XML Schema. Any property of the IMS/LOM metadata model can be defined in a metadata template. The metadata fields in a template can be populated either by static strings, or dynamic macros generated using information available to intraLibrary.
Metadata template macros can be called up using the macroname in curly brackets, such as {UserFullName}. A complete list of metadata template macros is given in Appendix 1. Metadata template macros cannot currently be called up as part of another string, so including The user who wrote this is {UserFullName} in the copyright.description field won't work.
The following example shows how you can mix static strings and metadata-template macros in the lifecycle section of a template defined IMS Metadata (XML) format:
<lifecycle>
<contribute>
<role>
<source>
<langstring xml:lang="x-none">LOMv1.0</langstring>
</source>
<value>
<langstring xml:lang="x-none">Author</langstring>
</value>
</role>
<centity>
<vcard>{UserVCard}</vcard>
</centity>
<date>
<datetime>{NowCurrentDate}</datetime>
</date>
</contribute>
</lifecycle>
You can use an XML Editor to compose and validate your metadata template. Using some of the metadata-template macros in particular fields may cause a validation error, but this does not necessarily mean your template will not work in intraLibrary. For example, using the {ObjectFileSize} macro in the technical.size field of the metadata will cause a validation error, because the XML Schema requires this element to contain a number. Therefore, if you are using a validating editor such as XML Spy, it is probably best to insert the metadata-template macro after you have finalised and validated the overall structure of your template.
In the above section six different types of email notifications were considered. The text for these email notifications can be modified by the administrator by altering the templates which are contained in the email templates directory on the configuration directory on the server in which intraLibrary is installed. The example below shows a sample template for an email about an object changing state (stageChangeEmail.txt). There is a list of the macros which can be used for each template in the section on Email Template Macros.
A new Learning Object is now available.
click on the link below to preview the object:
__url__
title:
__title__
description:
__description__
comment:
__comment__
classifications:
__classifications__
This message was sent to you by the administrator of intraLibrary.
The following macros can be used by all the email templates (StageChangeEmail.txt, StageChangeExternalEmail.txt, StageChangeObjectOwnerEmail.txt, UserPublishNotificationEmail.txt, adminPublishNotification.txt, annotationNotificationEmail.txt)
| Variable | Description |
| __repositoryName__ | Name of the repository which object is stored in |
| __url__ | The public URL of the learning object |
| __title__ | Name of the repository which object is stored in |
| __description__ | The description of the learning object (from metadata) |
| __currentStage__ | The stage which the object is currently in |
| __currentWorkflow__ | The workflow which the object is currently in |
| __classifications__ | List of all taxonpaths which the object is classified under |
The following variables are available for use in each email template except the annoatation notification email (i.e StageChangeEmail.txt, StageChangeExternalEmail.txt, StageChangeObjectOwnerEmail.txt, UserPublishNotificationEmail.txt, adminPublishNotification.txt, )
| Variable | Description |
| __publisher__ | Name of the person publishing or moving the object. |
| __comment__ | Comment made when moving the object. |
The following variables are available only on the annotation notification email (annotationNotificationEmail.txt)
| Variable | Description |
| __annotation_text__ | The text body of the annotation which has been written by the user |
| __star_rating__ | Star rating for the annotation |
| __annotation_date__ | Date of the annotation |
| __Username__ | The name of the user who wrote the annotation |
The macros available for populating metadata templates are:
| Property | Description | Possible Uses (target metadata fields) | |
| Properties of the user | |||
| {UserFullName} | User Account | The full name of the user, as stored in the user profile | |
| {UserAffiliation} | The affiliation (employer) of the user, as stored in the user profile | ||
| {UserEmail} | The email address of the user, as stored in the user profile | ||
| {UserPreferredLanguage} | The language the user has chosen as their preferred language in their user profile | general.language metametadata.language educational.language |
|
| {UserUsername} | The intraLibrary username of the user | ||
| {UserVcard} | Returns the user's stored details in vcard format. | lifecycle.contribute.centity metametadata.contribute.centity annotation.centity |
|
| Properties related to the current time | |||
| {NowCurrentDate} | Current date in UTC format | lifecycle.contribute.datetime metametadata.contribute.datetime annotation.datetime |
|
| {NowGuid} | A globally unique identifier (GUID) generated using the current time. | ||
| Properties of the learning object | |||
| {ObjectMimeType} | Mime-type of single-file object matched by file extension | technical.format | |
| {ObjectPublicURL} | Full "public URL" for this object for this user | technical.location | |
| {ObjectFileSize} | Size in bytes of uploaded file or package zip file | technical.size | |
| {ObjectAggregationLevel} | Not currently supported Placeholder for an automatically generated value of 1-4 depending on predefined rules for assessing the complexity of a learning object. |
||
| {ObjectCreationDate} | Date of creation, extracted from metadata in digital file. Currently supported for JPEG images (exif:DateTimeOriginal) only. | lifecycle.contribute.date | |
| {ObjectCreator} | Author/creator of digital object, extracted from metadata in digital file. Currently supported for JPEG images (tiff:Artist) only. | lifecycle.contribute.centity | |
| {ObjectFilename} | Returns filename of uploaded single file, or filename of package .zip file | general.title | |
| {ObjectId} | The OAI identifier of the object | general.catalogentry.entry | |
| {ObjectLocalID} | The number of the object in the repository | general.catalogentry.entry | |
| Properties of the repository | |||
| {RepositoryName} | The name give to the intraLibrary repository in the properties file | ||
| {RepositoryID} | OAI identifier of the intraLibrary repository assigned in the properties file | ||
| {RepositoryAdminEmail} | Email address of the repository administrator | ||
| Properties of Application Profiles | |||
| {ApplicationProfileName} | The recognised name of the application profile, e.g. "CanCore" | metametadata.metadatascheme | |
| {ApplicationProfileSource} | The authoritative source for the application profile | ||
| {ApplicationProfileVersion} | Version number of the application profile | ||
| Properties of JPEG images (extracted from EXIF metadata) | |||
| {ImageCompressionScheme} | tiff:Compression | Z39.87: Compression.CompressionScheme | |
| {ImageCompressionRatio} | exif:CompressedBitsPerPixel | Z39.87: Compression.CompressionLevel | |
| {ImagePixelWidth} | exif:PixelXDimension | Z39.87: ImageWidth | |
| {ImagePixelHeight} | exif:PixelYDimension | Z39.87: ImageLength | |
| {ImageCameraMake} | tiff:Make | Z39.87: DigitalCameraManufacturer | |
| {ImageCameraModel} | tiff:Model | Z39.87: DigitalCameraModel | |
| {ImageOrientation} | tiff:Orientation | Z39.87: Orientation | |